Prince Harry and Meghan Markle thread

Aug 4, 2007
804
3,416
Sometimes I wonder if I'm being unfair to Methane. Maybe she has a very scowly resting b*tch face, and what we see as her glare or evil eyes is actually her natural expression. It's like this unlikable colleague I currently have who is quite free with the definition of "truth" and only simpers at you when she needs something from you. Her boss commiserated with me and described her as having a "coffin" face :lol:

And then I come to my senses and remind myself that no matter how foul a resting b*tch face you may be born with, you do not need to live up to it by being a harpy inside.
Ha, to be honest, I don’t see what you guys are seeing most of the time when you point out these moments of her evil face showing.
 

csshopper

O.G.
Jul 26, 2008
2,427
12,618
Ha, to be honest, I don’t see what you guys are seeing most of the time when you point out these moments of her evil face showing.
The Body Language Guy on YouTube analyzes videos with very slow speed that capture much of what we are referring to. It's not always obvious at first, but it's there. He has an extensive library of programs. The slips when her real self is revealed happen in so many situations that it's hard to ignore, he even picked up on her being momentarily angry with H when she reached for his hand during their wedding ceremony and he did not take it.

There have been instances where her look is so hateful and evil that it's kind of scary because if it slips through, even momentarily, in a public setting then one wonders what goes on when she's away from a camera. Looking at some of this I have never doubted the stories of her bullying and I have concern about her as a mother.
 

bisousx

O.G.
Jan 3, 2008
12,380
10,466
out of my suitcase
Oct 7, 2019
3,959
40,464
The only time I've ever seen The Hand (lol) and her mum within 10ft of each other was at her wedding and the baby shower. When were they ever seen in public together?
*I'm not saying you're wrong, I just honestly can't recall.
For a short while she brought her to some functions and occasions where she hadn't really any business to be (e.g. introducing Archie to the Queen and Philip - I don't think the Middletons came with three Cambridge kids, but if so, the Cambridges didn't invite the press also). That was when the narrative how oh so close they were was heavily pushed on us.

Speaking of Doria, has she been seen in months? No sappy "The Harkles are spending Thanksgiving with Doria whom Harry is oh so close to"?
 
Last edited:
Oct 7, 2019
3,959
40,464
Ha, to be honest, I don’t see what you guys are seeing most of the time when you point out these moments of her evil face showing.
I like to call them face malfunctions. She's all smiles and acting oh so cute, then someone does or says something and her face will completely slip until she catches herself. It is quite unsettling to watch. But you really need to see video footage, not just photographs.
 
Last edited:
Oct 7, 2019
3,959
40,464
It's like she read a couple of books on neurolinguistic programming. Put your hand on Harry's back and *poof* he steps aside and lets her walk in front. Every.Single.Time.
My favourite situation from this event: when he stepped over to greet someone and she neither let go of his hand nor made the move with him. She just stood there clinging onto his hand for dear life while their arms got longer and longer. Just...why is she completely not right in the head.
 

xincinsin

TEAM SCARF MISTRESS 2021
Jul 8, 2015
5,657
51,801
Escapee from BAN
It's like she read a couple of books on neurolinguistic programming. Put your hand on Harry's back and *poof* he steps aside and lets her walk in front. Every.Single.Time.
Like kung fu or judo. In Asian martial arts, there is a concept - kind of difficult to translate but it's like using using minimal force to divert heavy impact. She has trained him to give way the moment she touches him, so a slight pull on his shoulder translates into his entire body shifting aside. She doesn't even need to elbow him or shove him hard any more.
 

1LV

Member
Jan 10, 2016
2,507
11,365
For a short while she brought her to some functions and occasions where she hadn't really any business to be (e.g. introducing Archie to the Queen and Philip - I don't think the Middletons came with three Cambridge kids, but if so, the Cambridges didn't invite the press also). That was when the narrative how oh so close they were was heavily pushed on us.

Speaking of Doria, has she been seen in months? No sappy "The Harkles are spending Thanksgiving with Doria whom Harry is oh so close to"?
Either Doria has chosen not to be part of this dog and pony show, or she has served her purpose and has been Markled.
 

jelliedfeels

Member
Feb 28, 2021
1,569
12,768
I thought meghan at the red dress event looked like Paula Patton in mission impossible. Something about the eye makeup probably. Although Paula patton is more attractive
I think the thing with M is she’s always getting fillers or doing makeup or getting photoshopped to change her face (never changes that hair alas) so she does end up looking like a bootleg version of another prettier celeb. One day it’s Paula, next day J-Law, day after that it’s Medusa.

Didn’t Paula Patton also marry a total prat? That’s something they’ve got in common I guess.
Either Doria has chosen not to be part of this dog and pony show, or she has served her purpose and has been Markled.
Yes it is quite interesting. She did seem to disappear when they left the BRF to my mind. Was she in the US media at all?

I think she probably got markled as she served her purpose as proof of M’s black heritage.

She probably also served as a horrible reminder of M’s mere humanity and it is much more goddess-like to be born from the sky and raise yourself without parents.

The more I think about it, the more I think it serves D right as she didn’t fight for the reputation of her family or for the ex who did a lot to help bring up their daughter when M was clearly telling H and family she was from a broken home and none of them cared about her.

I know some people think she lives with them but I can’t see them having anyone they can’t simply fire and NDA so close to the nucleus of operations.
 

1LV

Member
Jan 10, 2016
2,507
11,365
I think the thing with M is she’s always getting fillers or doing makeup or getting photoshopped to change her face (never changes that hair alas) so she does end up looking like a bootleg version of another prettier celeb. One day it’s Paula, next day J-Law, day after that it’s Medusa.

Didn’t Paula Patton also marry a total prat? That’s something they’ve got in common I guess.

Yes it is quite interesting. She did seem to disappear when they left the BRF to my mind. Was she in the US media at all?

I think she probably got markled as she served her purpose as proof of M’s black heritage.

She probably also served as a horrible reminder of M’s mere humanity and it is much more goddess-like to be born from the sky and raise yourself without parents.

The more I think about it, the more I think it serves D right as she didn’t fight for the reputation of her family or for the ex who did a lot to help bring up their daughter when M was clearly telling H and family she was from a broken home and none of them cared about her.

I know some people think she lives with them but I can’t see them having anyone they can’t simply fire and NDA so close to the nucleus of operations.
One day it’s Paula, next day J-Law, day after that it’s Medusa
“it is much more goddess-like to be born from the sky and raise yourself without parents

Omg. Hilarious!